A saturating mutagenesis CRISPR-Cas9 mediated functional genomic screen identifies cis- and trans-regulatory elements of Oct4 in embryonic stem cells
Matthew C. CanveriD, Pratibha Tripathi, Michael J. BulleniD, Moshe OlshanskyiD, Yogesh Kumar, Lee H. WongiD, Stephen J. Turner, Samuel LessardiD, Luca PinelloiD, Stuart H. OrkiniD, Partha Pratim DasiD
Abstract
Regulatory elements (REs) consist of enhancers and promoters that occupy a significant portion of the non-coding genome and control gene expression programs either in -cis or in - trans. Putative REs have been identified largely based on their regulatory features (co-occupancy of ESC-specific transcription factors, enhancer histone marks and DNase hypersensitivity) in mouse embryonic stem cells (mESCs). However, less has been established regarding their regulatory functions in their native context. We deployed cis- and trans-regulatory elements scanning through saturating mutagenesis and sequencing (ctSCAN-SMS) to target elements within the [~]12kb cis-region (Cis-REs; CREs) of the Oct4 gene locus, as well as genome-wide 2,613 high-confidence trans-REs (TREs), in mESCs. ctSCAN-SMS identified 10 CREs and 12 TREs, as novel candidate REs of the Oct4 gene in mESCs. Furthermore, deletions of these candidate REs confirmed that the majority of the REs are functionally active, and CREs are more active than TREs in controlling Oct4 gene expression. A subset of active CREs and TREs physically interact with the Oct4 promoter to varying degrees; specifically, a greater number of active CREs compared to active TREs, physically interact with the Oct4 promoter. Moreover, comparative genomics analysis reveals that more number of active CREs than active TREs are evolutionary conserved between mouse and primates, including human. Taken together, our study demonstrates the reliability and robustness of ctSCAN-SMS screening to identify critical REs, and investigate their roles in the regulation of transcriptional output of a target gene (in this case Oct4) in their native context.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 12
- FWCI
- 0.57
- Field percentile
- top 40%
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Defining Essential Enhancer for Pluripotent stem cells using Features Oriented CRISPR-Cas9 Screen
Haofei Wang, Tushar Warrier, … Yuin‐Han Loh·Cell ReportsPeer-reviewed·Oct 1, 2020
- Endogenous retroviruses co-opted as divergently transcribed regulatory elements shape the regulatory landscape of embryonic stem cells
Stylianos Bakoulis, Robert Krautz, … Robin Andersson·Nucleic Acids ResearchPeer-reviewed·Jan 27, 2022
- Statistical learning quantifies transposable element-mediated cis-regulation
Cyril Pulver, Delphine Grün, … Didier Trono·Genome biologyPeer-reviewed·Nov 10, 2023
- Cis-Regulatory Atlas in Primary Human CD4+ T Cells
Kurtis Stefan, Artem Barski·BMC GenomicsPeer-reviewed·May 11, 2023
- Multi-center integrated analysis of non-coding CRISPR screens
David Yao, Josh Tycko, … Steven K. Reilly·bioRxiv·Dec 21, 2022
- Functional evaluation of transposable elements as transcriptional enhancers in mouse embryonic and trophoblast stem cells
Christopher D Todd, Özgen Deniz, … Miguel Ramos Branco·eLifePeer-reviewed·Apr 23, 2019