Tuning antibody stability and function by rational designs of framework mutations
Joseph Chi-Fung NgiD, Alicia M. ChenowethiD, Maria Laura De SciscioiD, Melanie GranditsiD, Anthony CheungiD, Tooki ChuiD, Alexandra J. McCrawiD, Jitesh ChauhaniD, Yi LiuiD, Dongjun GuoiD, Semil Patel, Alice Kosmider, Daniela IancuiD, Sophia N. KaragiannisiD, Franca FraternaliiD
Abstract
Artificial intelligence and machine learning models have been developed to engineer antibodies for specific recognition of antigens, however these approaches often focus on the antibody complementarity determining region (CDR) whilst ignoring the immunoglobulin framework (FW) which provides structural rigidity and support for the flexible CDR loops. Here we present an integrated computational-experimental workflow, combining static structure analyses, molecular dynamics simulations and in vitro physicochemical and functional assays to generate rational designs of FW mutations for modulating antibody stability and activity. We first showed that recent antibody-specific language models lacked insights in FW mutagenesis, in comparison to approaches which utilised antibody structure information. Using the widely-used breast cancer therapeutic trastuzumab as a use case, we designed stabilising mutants which were distal to the CDR and preserved the antibodys functionality to engage its cognate antigen (HER2) and induce antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC). Interestingly, guided by local backbone motions predicted using molecular dynamics simulations, we designed a FW mutation on the trastuzumab light chain which retained antigen-binding effects but lost Fab-mediated and Fc-mediated effector functions. This highlighted effects of FW on immunological functions engendered in distal areas of the antibody, and the importance to consider attributes other than binding affinity when assessing antibody function. Our approach incorporates interdomain dynamics and distal effects between FW and the Fc domains, expands the scope of antibody engineering beyond the CDR, and underscores the importance of a holistic perspective that considers the entire antibody structure as a whole in optimising antibody stability, developability and function.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 3
- FWCI
- 1.72
- Field percentile
- top 17%
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Reliable energy-based antibody humanization and stabilization
A. Tennenhouse, L. Khmelnitsky, … S. J. Fleishman·bioRxiv·Aug 14, 2022
- Energy-guided combinatorial co-optimization of antibody affinity and stability
Ariel Tennenhouse, Adva Mechaly, … Sarel Jacob Fleishman·bioRxiv·Nov 26, 2025
- Are frameworks independent from CDRs in antibodies? Exploring CDR-framework correlation networks of antibodies
Amauri Donadon Leal, Paulo Sergio Lopes de Oliveira, Leandro Oliveira Bortot·bioRxiv·Dec 14, 2025
- Enhancement of antibody thermostability and affinity by computational design in the absence of antigen
Mark Rowland Hutchinson, Jeffrey A. Ruffolo, … Gilad Kaplan·mAbsPeer-reviewed·Jun 20, 2024
- Insights into the stability of a therapeutic antibody Fab fragment by molecular dynamics and its stabilization by computational design
- VCAb: A web-tool for structure-guided antibody engineering
Dongjun Guo, Joseph Chi-Fung Ng, … Franca Fraternali·Bioinformatics AdvancesPeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2024