bioRxivImmunologyPreprint
Spatiotemporal control of STING activation and saRNA delivery decouples humoral and cellular immunity
David J. PeeleriD, Ziyin WangiD, Livia SpigaiD, Simbarashe JokonyaiD, Thomas ChubickaiD, Daniel ReumanniD, Katsiaryna ShramkoiD, Laia Rigat NogaredaiD, Paul F. McKayiD, Dinh Chuong NguyeniD, Marco Antonio Briones-OrtaiD, Patrick S. StaytoniD, Molly M. StevensiD, Robin J. ShattockiD, John S. TregoningiD
Abstract
Self-amplifying mRNA (saRNA) vaccine formulations link the location and timing of antigen expression to innate immune stimulation by both RNA cargo and carrier. We hypothesized that targeting a polymeric STING agonist prodrug (polySTING) to antigen-presenting cells (APCs) independently of saRNA delivery could tune vaccines responses without limiting saRNA expression. By varying the time and location of STING signaling relative to saRNA delivered by muscle-restricted (polyplex, PP) and lymph node-draining (lipid nanoparticle, LNP) saRNA formulations, we studied how spatiotemporal colocalization of type I interferon (IFN-I) and antigen expression impacts innate and adaptive vaccine responses. Co-administering PP + polySTING decreased antigen-specific adaptive type 1 responses by mismatching early lymph node IFN-I and later arriving antigen; this could be reversed by delaying polySTING delivery timing. Conversely, synchronizing early LNP saRNA delivery and polySTING IFN-I in the lymph node boosted saRNA type 1 T cell responses without impacting humoral immunity, which re-directed antigen-intrinsic immune skewing and enhanced protection against pulmonary Acinetobacter baumannii challenge. Collectively, these findings define formulation-specific innate immune responses to saRNA vaccines and establish APC-targeted adjuvants as a strategy to tune saRNA vaccine immunogenicity.
- Citations
- 0
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Incorporation of 5 methylcytidine alleviates innate immune response to self-amplifying RNA vaccine
M. Komori, A. L. Morey, … H. Akiyama·bioRxiv·Nov 1, 2023
- Targeted suppression of type 1 interferon signaling during RNA delivery enhances vaccine-elicited immunity
Byungji Kim, Ryan Ramsey Hosn, … Darrell J. Irvine·bioRxiv·Mar 9, 2025
- Directing an mRNA-LNP vaccine toward lymph nodes improves humoral and cellular immunity against SARS-CoV-2
D. M. Francis, R. Chen, … H. Ji·bioRxiv·Aug 25, 2021
- An intranasal, NLC-delivered self-amplifying RNA vaccine establishes protective immunity against pre-pandemic H5N1 and H7N9 influenza
Matthew Ykema, Michael A. Davis, … Emily A. Voigt·bioRxiv·Jan 7, 2025
- Corticosteroids and cellulose purification improve respectively the in vivo translation and vaccination efficacy of self-amplifying mRNAs
Z. Zhong, S. Mc Cafferty, … N. Sanders·bioRxiv·Aug 26, 2020
- Controlling reactogenicity while preserving immunogenicity from a self-amplifying RNA vaccine by modulating nucleocytoplasmic transport
Jason A. Wojcechowskyj, Robyn M. Jong, … Thomas Folliard·npj VaccinesPeer-reviewed·Apr 29, 2025