Genome editing of phylogenetically distinct bacteria using portable retron-mediated recombineering
Alejandro González-DelgadoiD, Laura Bonillo-LopeziD, Milo S. JohnsoniD, Nastassia KnödlsederiD, Ching‐Chung KoiD, Yassir LekbachiD, Jee‐Hwan OhiD, Hemaa SelvakumariD, Michael C. Wold, Zihan YuiD, Virginia AragóniD, Jeffrey A. GralnickiD, Marc GüelliD, Graham F. HatfulliD, Benjamin K. KeitziD, Britt Louise KoskellaiD, Vivek K. MutalikiD, Jan‐Peter van PijkereniD, Seth L. ShipmaniD
Abstract
Advanced genome editing technologies have enabled rapid and flexible rewriting of the Escherichia coli genome, benefiting fundamental biology and biomanufacturing. Unfortunately, some of the most useful technologies to advance genome editing in E. coli have not yet been ported into other bacterial species. For instance, the addition of bacterial retrons to the genome editing toolbox has increased the efficiency of recombineering in E. coli by enabling sustained, abundant production of ssDNA recombineering donors by reverse transcription that install flexible, precise edits in the prokaryotic chromosome. To extend the utility of this technology beyond E. coli, we surveyed the portability and versatility of retron-mediated recombineering across three different bacterial phyla (Proteobacteria, Bacillota and Actinomycetota) and a total of 15 different species. We found that retron recombineering is functional in all species tested, reaching editing efficiencies above 20% in six of them, above 40% in three of them, and above 90% in two of them. We also tested the extension of the recombitron architecture optimizations and strain backgrounds in a subset of hosts to additionally increase editing rates. The broad recombitron survey carried out in this study forms the basis for widespread use of retron-derived technologies through the whole Bacteria domain.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 3
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- An experimental census of retrons for DNA production and genome editing
Asim G Khan, Matías Rojas-Montero, … Seth L. Shipman·Nature BiotechnologyPeer-reviewed·Sep 17, 2024
- Phage defense and genome editing using novel retrons sourced from isolated environmental bacteria
Kazuo Nakamura, Karen Huilin Zhang, … Seth L. Shipman·bioRxiv·Jan 29, 2025
- Bridge recombinase enables versatile rewriting of bacterial genomes
Jaymin R. Patel, Sophia E. Swartz, … Brady F. Cress·bioRxiv·May 5, 2026
- Improved architectures for flexible DNA production using retrons across kingdoms of life
Santiago C. Lopez, Kate D Crawford, … Seth L. Shipman·Nature Chemical BiologyPeer-reviewed·Dec 23, 2021
- Bacterial retrons enable precise gene editing in human cells
B. Zhao, S.-A. A. Chen, … H. B. Fraser·The CRISPR JournalPeer-reviewed·Feb 22, 2022
- RecT recombinase expression enables efficient gene editing in Enterococcus
V. Chen, M. E. Griffin, H. C. Hang·Applied and Environmental MicrobiologyPeer-reviewed·Aug 26, 2021