Antibacterial potency of Type VI amidase effector toxins is dependent on substrate topology and cellular context
A. Radkov, A. L. Sapiro, S. Flores, C. Henderson, H. Saunders, R. Kim, S. Massa, S. Thompson, C. Mateusiak, J. Biboy, Z. Zhao, L. M. Starita, W. Hatleberg, W. Vollmer, A. B. Russell, J.-P. Simorre, S. Anthony-Cahill, P. Brzovic, B. Hayes, S. Chou
Abstract
Members of the bacterial T6SS amidase effector (Tae) superfamily of toxins are delivered between competing bacteria to degrade cell wall peptidoglycan. Although Taes share a common substrate, they exhibit distinct antimicrobial potency across different competitor species. To investigate the molecular basis governing these differences, we quantitatively defined the functional determinants of Tae1 from Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1 using a combination of nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) and a high-throughput in vivo genetic approach called deep mutational scanning (DMS). As expected, combined analyses confirmed the role of critical residues near the Tae1 catalytic center. Unexpectedly, DMS revealed substantial contributions to enzymatic activity from a much larger, ring-like functional hot spot extending around the entire circumference of the enzyme. Comparative DMS across distinct growth conditions highlighted how functional contribution of different surfaces is highly context-dependent, varying alongside composition of targeted cell walls. These observations suggest that Tae1 engages with the intact cell wall network through a more distributed three-dimensional interaction interface than previously appreciated, providing an explanation for observed differences in antimicrobial potency across divergent Gram-negative competitors. Further binding studies of several Tae1 variants with their cognate immunity protein demonstrate that requirements to maintain protection from Tae activity may be a significant constraint on the mutational landscape of tae1 toxicity in the wild. In total, our work reveals that Tae diversification has likely been shaped by multiple independent pressures to maintain interactions with binding partners that vary across bacterial species and conditions.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papersReproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Amidase and Lysozyme Dual Functions in TseP Reveal a New Family of Chimeric Effectors in the Type VI Secretion System
Zeng‐Hang Wang, Ying An, … Tao Dong·eLifePeer-reviewed·Oct 15, 2024
- A Superfamily of T6SS Antibacterial Effectors Displaying L,D-carboxypeptidase Activity Towards Peptidoglycan
S. Sibinelli-Sousa, J. T. Hespanhol, … E. Bayer-Santos·bioRxiv·Feb 18, 2020
- Lipopolysaccharide integrity primes bacterial sensitivity to a cell wall-degrading intermicrobial toxin
K. L. Trotta, B. M. Hayes, … S. Chou·bioRxiv·Jan 20, 2023
- Delivery determinants of an Acinetobacter baumannii type VI secretion system bifunctional peptidoglycan hydrolase.
Valeriya Bezkorovayna, Brooke K. Hayes, … John D. Boyce·mBioPeer-reviewed·Dec 31, 2024
- An N-degron proteolytic pathway modulates recipient susceptibility to T6SS DNase effectors
Yung‐Hui Victoria Wen, Hsiao‐Han Lin, … Erh‐Min Lai·bioRxiv·Apr 19, 2026
- Evolved resistance against the type 6 secretion system is toxin specific
William P. J. Smith, Alejandro Tejada-Arranz, … Michael A. Brockhurst·bioRxiv·Mar 17, 2026