Checkpoint non-fidelity induces a complex landscape of lineage fitness after DNA damage
Callum J. Campbell, Ashok R. VenkitaramaniD, Alessandro EspositoiD
Abstract
DNA damage in proliferating mammalian cells causes death1, senescence2 or continued survival, via checkpoints that monitor damage and regulate cell cycle progression, DNA repair and fate determination3. Cell cycle checkpoints facilitate tumour suppression by preventing the generation of proliferating mutated cells4, particularly by blocking passage of DNA lesions into replication and mitosis5. While checkpoint non-fidelity permits cells to carry genomic aberrations into subsequent cell cycle phases6, its long-term consequences on lineages descendant from damaged cells remains poorly characterised. Devising methods for microscopy-based lineage tracing, we unexpectedly demonstrate that transient DNA damage to single living cells bearing a negligent checkpoint induces heterogenous cell-fate outcomes in their descendant generations removed from the initial insult. After transiently damaged cells undergo an initial arrest, pairs of descendant cells without obvious cell-cycle abnormalities either divide or die in a seemingly stochastic way. Progeny of transiently damaged cells may die generations afterwards, creating considerable variability of lineage fitness that promotes overall persistence in a mutagenic environment. Descendants of damaged cells frequently form micronuclei, activating immunogenic signalling. Our findings reveal previously unrecognized, heterogenous effects of cellular DNA damage that manifest long afterwards in descendant cells. We suggest that these heterogenous descendant cell-fate responses may function physiologically to ensure the elimination and immune clearance of damaged cell lineages, but pathologically, may enable the prolonged survival of cells bearing mutagenic damage.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papersReproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- DNA Damage Checkpoint Dynamics Drive Cell Cycle Phase Transitions
Hui Xiao Chao, Cere E. Poovey, … Jeremy E. Purvis·bioRxiv·Aug 4, 2017
- DNA damage checkpoints balance a tradeoff between diploid- and polyploid-derived arrest failures
Kotaro Fujimaki, Ashwini Jambhekar, Galit Lahav·Cell ReportsPeer-reviewed·Sep 27, 2025
- Timing of DNA damage checkpoint adaptation predicts post-mitotic proliferative competence
Ambra Dondi, Erika Calabrese, … Rosella Visintin·bioRxiv·Sep 17, 2026
- Adaptation to DNA damage as a bet-hedging mechanism in a fluctuating environment
P Roux, Delphine Salort, Zhou Xu·Royal Society Open SciencePeer-reviewed·Aug 1, 2021
- A limited number of double-strand DNA breaks are sufficient to delay cell cycle progression.
J. van den Berg, A. G. Manjon, … R. H. Medema·bioRxiv·May 7, 2018
- Persistent DNA Repair Signaling and DNA Polymerase Theta Promote Broken Chromosome Segregation
D. E. Clay, H. S. Bretscher, … D. T. Fox·bioRxiv·Jun 18, 2021