Synthetic engineering demonstrates that synergy among enhancers involves an increase in transcriptionally productive enhancer-gene contacts
Endika HaroiD, Marianna IliadouiD, Shyam RamasamyiD, Thais EaloiD, Víctor M. CampaiD, Tomás PachanoiD, A. Marieke OudelaariD, Álvaro Rada-IglesiasiD
Abstract
Enhancers are non-coding cis-regulatory elements that control the expression of distally located genes in a tissue- and time-specific manner. Recent studies indicate that enhancers can differ in their underlying genetic architecture and regulatory properties. However, these different types of enhancers were previously investigated under rather variable conditions (e.g. model organism, cell type, enhancer-promoter distance, type of target promoter, etc.), thus introducing confounding factors that make it difficult to discern the distinct regulatory properties of each enhancer type. To overcome these limitations, here we generated transgenic mouse embryonic stem cells (mESC) lines in which different types of synthetic enhancers (i.e. "typical" enhancer, CTCF-associated enhancer, enhancer cluster/super-enhancer) were built upon the same "core" neural enhancer and inserted at the same distance (i.e. 100 Kb) from a typical developmental gene (i.e. Gata6). Subsequently, the mESC lines were differentiated to systematically compare the regulatory properties of the different enhancer types under identical conditions. Regarding the CTCF-associated enhancer, our data revealed that the addition of a CTCF site to the "core" enhancer increased insulation and led to the formation of a smaller contact domain, while having a rather mild effect on enhancer-promoter contact frequency and target gene expression. On the other hand, in comparison to the "core" enhancer alone, the enhancer cluster synergistically increased target gene expression and burst fraction. Importantly, we found that, in contrast to previous models, the strong regulatory activity of the enhancer cluster can not be explained by changes in enhancer-promoter contact frequency or the formation of transcriptional condensates. Instead, our data suggest that the emergent regulatory properties of enhancer clustering preferentially entail an increase in RNA Polymerase II pause release and, thus, in the fraction of enhancer-promoter contacts that are transcriptionally productive.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 1
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Enhancer control of promoter activity and variability via frequency modulation of clustered transcriptional bursts
Jana Tünnermann, Grégory Roth, … Luca Giorgetti·Nature GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Jul 14, 2026
- Enhancer cooperativity can compensate for loss of activity over large genomic distances
Henry Thomas, Songjie Feng, … Christa Buecker·Molecular CellPeer-reviewed·Dec 2, 2024
- A flexible repertoire of transcription factor binding sites and diversity threshold determines enhancer activity in embryonic stem cells
Gurdeep Singh, Shanelle Mullany, … Jennifer A. Mitchell·Genome ResearchPeer-reviewed·Apr 1, 2021
- Live-cell imaging of enhancer-promoter dynamics reveals transient contact-driven gene activation
Jin Yang, Henrik Dahl Pinholt, … Anders S. Hansen·bioRxiv·Jun 21, 2026
- Robust regulatory interplay of enhancers, facilitators, and promoters in a native chromatin context
Zhou Zhou, Yang Cheng, … John T. Lis·CellPeer-reviewed·Jul 17, 2026
- Building regulatory landscapes: enhancer recruits cohesin to create contact domains, engage CTCF sites and activate distant genes
Niels J. Rinzema, Konstantinos Sofiadis, … Wouter L. de Laat·bioRxiv·Oct 5, 2021