Neuronal DNA repair reveals strategies to influence CRISPR editing outcomes
Gokul N. RamadossiD, Samali J. Namaganda, Manasi M. KumariD, Jennifer R. HamiltoniD, Rohit Kumar SharmaiD, Karena G. Chow, Luke A. Workley, Bria L MackliniD, Mengyuan SuniD, Alvin S. HaiD, Jiacheng LiuiD, Christof FellmanniD, Hannah L. Watry, Philip H. DierksiD, Rudra S. Bose, Julianne JiniD, Barbara S. PereziD, Cindy R. Sandoval EspinozaiD, Madeline MatiaiD, Serena Huei-An LuiD, Luke M. JudgeiD, Brian Rudolph ShyiD, André NussenzweigiD, Britt AdamsoniD, Niren MurthyiD, , Bruce R. ConkliniD
Abstract
Genome editing is poised to revolutionize treatment of genetic diseases, but poor understanding and control of DNA repair outcomes hinders its therapeutic potential. DNA repair is especially understudied in nondividing cells like neurons, which must withstand decades of DNA damage without replicating. This lack of knowledge limits the efficiency and precision of genome editing in clinically relevant cells. To address this, we used induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) and iPSC-derived neurons to examine how postmitotic human neurons repair Cas9-induced DNA damage. We discovered that neurons can take weeks to fully resolve this damage, compared to just days in isogenic iPSCs. Furthermore, Cas9-treated neurons upregulated unexpected DNA repair genes, including factors canonically associated with replication. Manipulating this response with chemical or genetic perturbations allowed us to direct neuronal repair toward desired editing outcomes. By studying DNA repair in postmitotic human cells, we uncovered unforeseen challenges and opportunities for precise therapeutic editing.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 31
- FWCI
- 9.25
- Field percentile
- top 1%
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Efficient in vivo neuronal genome editing in the mouse brain using nanocapsules containing CRISPR-Cas9 ribonucleoproteins
Jeanette M. Metzger, Yuyuan Wang, … Shaoqin Gong·bioRxiv·Jul 24, 2022
- Efficient base editing and development in human embryos without chromosomal alterations
Stepan Jerabek, Jimin Kim, … Dieter M. Egli·bioRxiv·Jun 1, 2026
- Minimal activation of the p53 DNA damage response by a modular cytosine base editor enables effective multiplexed gene knockout in induced pluripotent stem cells
Robert A. Blassberg, Olga Mielczarek, … Immacolata Porreca·bioRxiv·Jun 5, 2025
- Lineage-selective suicide gene system enables post-engraftment editing of cell therapy composition
Jennifer Jin, Chiara Pavan, … Clare L. Parish·bioRxiv·Jun 8, 2026
- DSB repair kinetics impair CRISPR-Cas9 editing in human embryos
Dieter M. Egli, Diego Marin, … Jishnu Talukdar·bioRxiv·May 7, 2025
- Global detection of DNA repair outcomes induced by CRISPR-Cas9
Mengzhu Liu, Weiwei Zhang, … Jiazhi Hu·Nucleic Acids ResearchPeer-reviewed·Jul 27, 2021