bioRxivImmunologyPreprint
Selective alteration to CD4 T cell differentiation by heterozygous IRF4L116R protects against neuroinflammation
Rebecca A. JaegeriD, Nadia A. RobertsiD, Cynthia M. TurnbulliD, Sandali SeneviratneiD, Rebecca L. BucklandiD, Dominik SpensbergeriD, Jessica A. PettittiD, Fiona D. BallardiD, Anne Brüstle, Anselm EndersiD
Abstract
The decision of naive T cells to differentiate into a specific Th cell subset after antigen encounter is a critical pivot point of the immune response and, when out of balance, can lead to autoimmunity, allergy or immunodeficiency. Th subset differentiation is determined by the expression of transcription factors including IRF4. We here describe a point mutation (IRF4L116R) in the DNA-binding domain of IRF4 leading to a dysregulation of CD4-T cell subsets and their functions. This point mutation does not alter overall protein expression. In sharp contrast to IRF4-null mice, neither the CD4/CD8 ratio nor T cell activation and memory is altered in naive mice carrying the point mutation. However, IRF4L116R T cells are reduced in their capability to differentiate into Th1, Th17 and Treg cells in a dose-dependent manner, contrasting with the findings in IRF4KO T cells. Particularly striking is the loss of Th1-differentiation in T cells from homozygous Irf4L116R/L116R mice while T cells completely lacking IRF4 show no reduction in Th1 differentiation. Furthermore, despite maintained ability to generate Th17 cells, expression of the IRF4L116R variant protects mice against disease development in the Th17 cell-dependent EAE mouse model of neuroinflammation. This contrasts with IRF4 knock-out mice, where expression of one wild-type allele of IRF4 is sufficient for full disease development. Together our results show that the L116R point mutation in IRF4 can selectively alter the differentiation and function of some CD4 T cell subsets and suggest that the L116R mutation is not a classical loss- or gain-of-function variant.
- organism: mouse
- assay: proteomics
- research focus: host-pathogen & immune response
- research focus: cell type annotation
- research focus: cell signaling & trafficking
- approach: experimental assay
- Citations
- 0
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Dissection of the microRNA transcriptomes of CD4+ T cell subsets in autoimmune inflammation identifies novel regulators of disease pathogenesis
Carolina Cunha, Paula Vargas Romero, … Anita Quintal Gomes·bioRxiv·Jun 23, 2025
- Increased activity of IRE1 improves the clinical presentation of EAE
Valerie C. Bracchi-Ricard, Kayla Nguyen, … Yair Argon·The FASEB JournalPeer-reviewed·Nov 20, 2023
- T cell derived HB-EGF prevents Th17 cell differentiation in an autocrine way.
D. M. W. Zaiss, F. Macdonald, J. van Loosdregt·bioRxiv·Feb 9, 2021
- Immuno-Responsive Gene-1: The Mitochondrial Key to Th17 Cell Pathogenicity in CNS Autoimmunity
M. Nematullah, M. Fatma, … s. Giri·bioRxiv·Dec 24, 2023
- BRD4 expression in microglia supports recruitment of T cells into the CNS and exacerbates EAE
Anup Dey, Matthew J Butcher, … Keiko Ozato·bioRxiv·Sep 13, 2024
- CD11c+ CD8 T cells cause IFN-g-dependent autoimmune neuroinflammation that is restrained by PD-1 signaling.
Daniel Hwang, Gholamreza Azizi, … Bogoljub Ćirić·JCI InsightPeer-reviewed·May 21, 2026