Nature AgingBioinformaticsPeer-reviewed journal article
A computational solution for bolstering reliability of epigenetic clocks: Implications for clinical trials and longitudinal tracking
Albert Higgins‐CheniD, Kyra ThrushiD, Yunzhang WangiD, Christopher J. MinteeriD, Pei‐Lun Kuo, Meng WangiD, Peter Niimi, Gabriel SturmiD, Jue LiniD, Ann Zenobia MooreiD, Stefania BandinelliiD, Christiaan H. VinkersiD, Eric H. G. J. M. VermetteniD, Bart P. F. RutteniD, Elbert GeuzeiD, Cynthia Okhuijsen‐PfeiferiD, Marte Z. van der HorstiD, Stefanie SchreiteriD, Stefan GutwinskiiD, Jurjen Justin LuykxiD, Martin A. PicardiD, Luigi FerrucciiD, Eileen M. CrimminsiD, Marco P. BoksiD, Sara HäggiD, , Morgan E. LevineiD
Abstract
Epigenetic clocks are widely used aging biomarkers calculated from DNA methylation data. Unfortunately, measurements for individual CpGs can be surprisingly unreliable due to technical noise, and this may limit the utility of epigenetic clocks. We report that noise produces deviations up to 3 to 9 years between technical replicates for six major epigenetic clocks. The elimination of low-reliability CpGs does not ameliorate this issue. Here, we present a novel computational multi-step solution to address this noise, involving performing principal component analysis on the CpG-level data followed by biological age prediction using principal components as input. This method extracts shared systematic variation in DNAm while minimizing random noise from individual CpGs. Our novel principal-component versions of six clocks show agreement between most technical replicates within 0 to 1.5 years, equivalent or improved prediction of outcomes, and more stable trajectories in longitudinal studies and cell culture. This method entails only one additional step compared to traditional clocks, does not require prior knowledge of CpG reliabilities, and can improve the reliability of any existing or future epigenetic biomarker. The high reliability of principal component-based epigenetic clocks will make them particularly useful for applications in personalized medicine and clinical trials evaluating novel aging interventions.
- organism: human
- assay: DNA methylation
- research focus: variant effect prediction
- approach: statistical model
- Citations
- 500
- FWCI
- 31.01
- Field percentile
- top 1%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Biological versus Technical Reliability of Epigenetic Clocks and Implications for Disease Prognosis and Intervention Response
Raghav Sehgal, Daniel S. Borrus, … Albert Higgins‐Chen·Aging CellPeer-reviewed·Jul 29, 2026
- When to Trust Epigenetic Clocks: Avoiding False Positives in Aging Interventions.
Daniel S. Borrus, Raghav Sehgal, … Albert Higgins‐Chen·Aging CellPeer-reviewed·Oct 1, 2026
- Epigenetic Age Prediction Remains Stable Across Common Variants and Diverse Ancestries
Turki M. Sobahy, Estefania Huergo, … David Gómez-Cabrero·medRxiv·Oct 26, 2025
- Applicability of epigenetic age models to next-generation methylation arrays
Leonardo D. Garma, Miguel Quintela-Fandiño·Genome MedicinePeer-reviewed·Oct 7, 2024
- R methylCIPHER: A Methylation Clock Investigational Package for Hypothesis-Driven Evaluation & Research
Kyra Thrush, Albert Higgins‐Chen, … Morgan E. Levine·bioRxiv·Jul 13, 2022
- Seven-CpG DNA Methylation Age determined by Single Nucleotide Primer Extension and Illumina's Infinium MethylationEPIC array provide highly comparable results
Valentin Max Vetter, Christian Humberto Kalies, … Ilja Demuth·Frontiers in GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Jan 17, 2022