Molecular PharmacologyBiochemistryPeer-reviewed journal article
CXCR1 and CXCR2 display receptor bias for shared chemokine agonists
Chanpreet JassaliD, Joseph Strawn, Emily K. WalshiD, Krishna RajarathnamiD, Sudarshan RajagopaliD
Abstract
G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) mediate diverse signaling outputs through their proximal transducers: G proteins, GRKs, and {beta}-arrestins. Although ligand bias at chemokine receptors (CKRs), where ligands for the same receptor display distinct signaling patterns, is well recognized, receptor bias, where the same agonist at different receptors yields distinct transducer engagement, remains poorly understood. We compared endogenous chemokine ligands (CXCL1, CXCL5, CXCL7, CXCL8) at the highly homologous CXCR1 and CXCR2 receptors using biosensor assays to measure Gi activation, {beta}-arrestin1/2 recruitment, GRK2/3/5/6 translocation, and receptor internalization. Our data reveal qualitatively different signaling patterns, most notably where CXCL1 acts as a G protein-biased partial agonist at CXCR1 but as a balanced full agonist at CXCR2. These signaling differences correlate with receptor internalization but not subcellular ERK activation patterns measured using compartment-specific biosensors. Collectively, our findings demonstrate receptor bias in CKR signaling, transducer activation, and compartmentalized kinase activation in translating chemokine identity into discrete functional outcomes. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENTChemokine ligand bias, where different ligands for the same receptor display different signaling patterns, is now well appreciated. However, there are only few examples of receptor bias, where the same agonist generates distinct signaling profiles at different receptors. Here we used biosensors and compartmental ERK biosensors, to show that CXCL1, CXCL5, CXCL7, and CXCL8 differentially engage G proteins, {beta}-arrestins, and GRKs, at CXCR1 and CXCR2. This work provides mechanistic insight into CXCR1/CXCR2 signaling diversity.
- organism: human
- assay: proteomics
- research focus: cell signaling & trafficking
- approach: experimental assay
- Citations
- 2
- FWCI
- 5.96
- Field percentile
- top 5%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Molecular insights into intrinsic transducer-coupling bias in the CXCR4-CXCR7 system
P. Sarma, H.-J. Yoon, … A. K. Shukla·bioRxiv·Jun 6, 2022
- Location bias contributes to functionally selective responses of biased CXCR3 agonists
D. S. Eiger, N. Boldizsar, … S. Rajagopal·bioRxiv·Jan 13, 2022
- Biased agonists of the chemokine receptor CXCR3 differentially drive formation of Gαi:β-arrestin complexes
K. Z. Zheng, J. S. Smith, … S. Rajagopal·bioRxiv·Jun 11, 2020
- Subcellular localization of GPCR kinases differentially modulate biased signaling at CXCR3
J. Gardner, D. S. Eiger, … S. Rajagopal·bioRxiv·Jul 11, 2022
- Structural Insights into Biased Signaling at Chemokine Receptor CCR7
Kotaro Tanaka, Kouki Nishikawa, … Naotaka Tsutsumi·Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesPeer-reviewed·Apr 29, 2026
- Molecular basis of ligand promiscuity, structural mimicry, and atypical dimerization in the chemokine receptors
S. Saha, F. K. Sano, … A. K. SHUKLA·bioRxiv·Feb 1, 2024