Massively parallel quantification of CRISPR editing in cells by TRAP-seq enables better design of Cas9, ABE, CBE gRNAs of high efficiency and accuracy
Xi XiangiD, Kunli QuiD, Xue LiangiD, Xiaoguang PaniD, Jun WangiD, Peng HaniD, Zhanying Dong, Lijun LiuiD, Jiayan Zhong, Tao MaiD, Yiqing WangiD, Jiaying YuiD, Xiaoying ZhaoiD, Siyuan LiiD, Zhe XuiD, Jinbao WangiD, Xiuqing ZhangiD, Hui JiangiD, Fengping XuiD, Lijin ZouiD, Huajing TengiD, Xin LiuiD, Xun XuiD, jian Zi WangiD, Huanming YangiD, , Yonglun LuoiD
Abstract
The CRISPR RNA-guided endonucleases Cas9, and Cas9-derived adenine/cytosine base editors (ABE/CBE), have been used in both research and therapeutic applications. However, broader use of this gene editing toolbox is hampered by the great variability of efficiency among different target sites. Here we present TRAP-seq, a versatile and scalable approach in which the CRISPR gRNA expression cassette and the corresponding surrogate site are captured by Targeted Reporter Anchored Positional Sequencing in cells. TRAP-seq can faithfully recapitulate the CRISPR gene editing outcomes introduced to the corresponding endogenous genome site and most importantly enables massively parallel quantification of CRISPR gene editing in cells. We demonstrate the utility of this technology for high-throughput quantification of SpCas9 editing efficiency and indel outcomes for 12,000 gRNAs in human embryonic kidney cells. Using this approach, we also showed that TRAP-seq enables high throughput quantification of both ABE and CBE efficiency at 12,000 sites in cells. This rich amount of ABE/CBE outcome data enable us to reveal several novel nucleotide features (e.g. preference of flanking bases, nucleotide motifs, STOP recoding types) affecting base editing efficiency, as well as designing improved machine learning-based prediction tools for designing SpCas9, ABE and CBE gRNAs of high efficiency and accuracy (>70%). We have integrated all the 12,000 CRISPR gene editing outcomes for SpCas9, ABE and CBE into a CRISPR-centered portal: The Human CRISPR Atlas. This study extends our knowledge on CRISPR gene and base editing, and will facilitate the application and development of CRISPR in both research and therapy.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 3
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- CRISPR adenine and cytosine base editors with reduced RNA off-target activities
Julian Grünewald, Ronghao Zhou, … J. Keith Joung·Nature BiotechnologyPeer-reviewed·Sep 1, 2019
- Towards best-practice approaches for CRISPR/Cas9 gene engineering
Claude Van Campenhout, Pauline Cabochette, … Véronique Kruys·bioRxiv·Dec 4, 2018
- IRI-CCE: A Platform for Evaluating CRISPR-based Base Editing Tools and Its Components
R. M. Shelake, D. Pramanik, J.-Y. Kim·bioRxiv·Jul 25, 2021
- Global-scale CRISPR gene editor specificity profiling by ONE-seq identifies population-specific, variant off-target effects
Karl Petri, Daniel Y. Kim, … Vikram Pattanayak·bioRxiv·Apr 5, 2021
- UNCOVERseq Enables Sensitive and Controlled Gene Editing Off-Target Nomination Across CRISPR-Cas Modalities and Systems
Kyle J. Kinney, Kun Jia, … Gavin Kurgan·Nature CommunicationsPeer-reviewed·Aug 11, 2026
- Context-dependent determinants of CRISPR-Cas9 editing efficiency revealed through cross-species endogenous editing analysis
Shai Cohen, Shaked Bergman, … Tamir Tuller·bioRxiv·Mar 18, 2026