bioRxivMolecular BiologyPreprint
Genome-scale mapping of DNA damage suppressors identifies GNB1L as essential for ATM and ATR biogenesis
Yichao ZhaoiD, Daniel R. TabetiD, Diana Rubio-ContrerasiD, Arne Nedergaard KousholtiD, Jochen WeileiD, Henrique Melo, Lisa HoegiD, Atina G. CotéiD, Zhen‐Yuan Lin, Dheva SetiaputraiD, Jos JonkersiD, Anne‐Claude GingrasiD, Fernando Gómez-HerrerosiD, Frederick P. RothiD, Daniel DurocheriD
Abstract
To maintain genome integrity, cells must avoid DNA damage by ensuring the accurate duplication of the genome and by having efficient repair and signaling systems that counteract the genome-destabilizing potential of DNA lesions. To uncover genes and pathways that suppress DNA damage in human cells, we undertook genome-scale CRISPR/Cas9 screens that monitored the levels of DNA damage in the absence or presence of DNA replication stress. We identified 160 genes in RKO cells whose mutation caused high levels of DNA damage in the absence of exogenous genotoxic treatment. This list was highly enriched in essential genes, highlighting the importance of genomic integrity for cellular fitness. Furthermore, the majority of these 160 genes are involved in a limited set of biological processes related to DNA replication and repair, nucleotide biosynthesis, RNA metabolism and iron sulfur cluster biogenesis, suggesting that genome integrity may be insulated from a wide range of cellular processes. Among the many genes identified and validated in this study, we discovered that GNB1L, a schizophrenia/autism-susceptibility gene implicated in 22q11.2 syndrome, protects cells from replication catastrophe promoted by mild DNA replication stress. We show that GNB1L is involved in the biogenesis of ATR and related phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase-related kinases (PIKKs) through its interaction with the TTT co-chaperone complex. These results implicate PIKK biogenesis as a potential root cause for the neuropsychiatric phenotypes associated with 22q11.2 syndrome. The phenotypic mapping of genes that suppress DNA damage in human cells therefore provides a powerful approach to probe genome maintenance mechanisms.
- organism: human
- assay: CRISPR screen
- research focus: gene regulatory network inference
- research focus: variant effect prediction
- research focus: drug response / drug discovery
- research focus: benchmarking
- approach: experimental assay
- Citations
- 0
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- A genetic map of the response to DNA damage in human cells
M. Olivieri, T. Cho, … D. Durocher·bioRxiv·Nov 18, 2019
- A consensus set of genetic vulnerabilities to ATR inhibition
Nicole Hustedt, Alejandro Álvarez-Quilón, … Daniel Durocher·Open BiologyPeer-reviewed·Sep 1, 2019
- Distinct ATRX functions cooperate with 9-1-1 and CST complexesto safeguard replication and telomere integrity
Sandra Segura‐Bayona, Marija Maric, … Simon J. Boulton·Nature Structural & Molecular BiologyPeer-reviewed·Jun 30, 2026
- ATRIP protects progenitor cells against DNA damage in vivo
G. E. Matos-Rodrigues, P. Grigaravicius, … R. A. P. Martins·bioRxiv·Feb 14, 2020
- ATR enforcement of the S/G2 checkpoint prevents premature S phase shutdown and genome instability
Melissa J. McEvoy, Joshua C. Saldivar·bioRxiv·May 9, 2026
- Genome-wide CRISPR synthetic lethality screen identifies a role for the ADP- ribosyltransferase PARP14 in replication fork stability controlled by ATR
A. Dhoonmoon, E. M. Schleicher, … G.-L. Moldovan·bioRxiv·Apr 8, 2020