bioRxivSynthetic BiologyPreprint
Expanding all-α-helical protein space through rational computational design
Katherine I. AlbaneseiD, Joel J. ChubbiD, Luis I. Gutierrez-RusiD, Xiyue LengiD, Kathleen W. KurganiD, Bram MylemansiD, Katarzyna OżgaiD, Rokas PetrenasiD, Andrey V. RomanyukiD, Amanda M. Acevedo‐JakeiD, Joel Roca‐MartíneziD, Stephen CrossiD, J. L. Ross AndersoniD, Jonathan ClaydeniD, Graham J. LeggettiD, Jennifer J. McManusiD, Thomas A. A. OliveriD, Christine Anne OrengoiD, Nigel Shaun ScruttoniD, Andrew John WilsoniD, Aimee L. BoyleiD, Derek N. WoolfsoniD
Abstract
De novo protein design is advancing rapidly1,2. This is being driven by AI to generate protein backbones, sequences, and structural models3-7. As a result, de novo designed proteins are becoming larger and more complex8-10, and increasingly explore new protein structures11,12. By contrast, natural proteins have evolved structural and functional complexity by modular combination of recurring protein domains13. Approximately 25% of these natural domains are mostly -helical structures14. Here we show how these can be expanded using rational computational design. Following the domain classification scheme CATH15, we build complex all- de novo proteins hierarchically using sequence-to-structure relationships for helix-helix interactions, systematic rules to connect helices, computational tools to design loops, and in silico evaluation. The pipeline starts with a target architecture of free-standing helices. These are connected into a topology by considering local arrangements of helical bundles using understood sequence-to-structure relationships for helix packing. Single-chain sequences are completed using template- and AI-based methods. Finally, AlphaFold models are assessed to give small numbers of designs for experimental validation. We test 31 designs for 14 different architectures and 25 topologies. 75% of these express as stable, monomeric, water-soluble proteins; and >30% yield X-ray crystal structures matching the designs to atomic accuracy and with new-to-nature structures. Finally, several of the scaffolds are functionalised through one-shot designs to deliver ion, small-molecule and protein binders.
- assay: protein structure
- research focus: protein design
- approach: statistical model
- approach: machine learning (classical)
- Citations
- 0
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Design of complicated all-α protein structures
K. Sakuma, N. Kobayashi, … N. Koga·bioRxiv·Jul 14, 2021
- AlphaDesign: A de novo protein design framework based on AlphaFold
Michael Jendrusch, Alessio Ling Jie Yang, … S. Kashif Sadiq·Molecular Systems BiologyPeer-reviewed·Jun 17, 2025
- Rationally seeded computational protein design
Katherine I. Albanese, Rokas Petrenas, … Derek N. Woolfson·bioRxiv·Aug 25, 2023
- De novo designed 3-helix bundle peptides and proteins with controlled topology and stability
Xiyue Leng, Katherine I. Albanese, … Derek N. Woolfson·Chemical SciencePeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2025
- Artificial intelligence method to design and fold alpha-helical structural proteins from the primary amino acid sequence
Z. Qin, L. Wu, … M. J. Buehler·bioRxiv·Jul 24, 2019
- De Novo Protein Fold Design Through Sequence-Independent Fragment Assembly Simulations
Robin Pearce, Xiaoqiang Huang, … Yang Zhang·Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesPeer-reviewed·Jan 19, 2023